Legal Opinion

Lalumio v. Fasseas

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1960No. 35950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Schaefer

The plaintiffs each of whom is engaged in the retail liquor business, brought this action to restrain the defendant State officers from collecting the $50 annual license fee imposed upon retailers of alcoholic liquor by the Liquor Control Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, chap. 43, par. 118.) The circuit court sustained the defendants’ motion to dismiss and the plaintiffs have appealed directly to this court because the case relates to the revenue. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, chap, 110, par. 75(1) (b).

The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are subject not only to the licensing provisions of the Liquor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Merrelli v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Lamere v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. City of Chicago Heights v. Public Service Co. of Northern IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Phillips v. City of MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Ewell v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State UniversitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ace Tire Co., Inc. v. Municipal Officers of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Federated Distributors, Inc. v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Memphis Retail Liquor Dealers' Ass'n v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Federated Distributors, Inc. v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lamar Advertising of Tennessee, Inc. v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API