Legal Opinion

Steur v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 31, 1946No. Docket No. 6350Published

Prior to August 1940 petitioner purchased tobacco for H. Duys & Co., in Holland and the Dutch East Indies, on a commission of 3 per cent of purchases, plus an annual salary of $ 10,000. In August 1940 petitioner and Duys entered into a new contract providing for the payment of the sum of 3 per cent commission and $ 10,000 salary, plus a bonus of 25 per cent of the net profit on the sales of tobacco bought by the petitioner and sold by Duys; Duys, however, to have a credit…

Read the full summary

Prior to August 1940 petitioner purchased tobacco for H. Duys & Co., in Holland and the Dutch East Indies, on a commission of 3 per cent of purchases, plus an annual salary of $ 10,000. In August 1940 petitioner and Duys entered into a new contract providing for the payment of the sum of 3 per cent commission and $ 10,000 salary, plus a bonus of 25 per cent of the net profit on the sales of tobacco bought by the petitioner and sold by Duys; Duys, however, to have a credit thereon of the amount of the 3 per cent commission on purchases. The amount of net profit -- and hence the amount of…

1Opinion of the Court

J. A. C. Steur, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Steur v. Commissioner

Docket No. 6350

United States Tax Court

7 T.C. 1075; 1946 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 45;

October 31, 1946, Promulgated

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Prior to August 1940 petitioner purchased tobacco for H. Duys & Co., in Holland and the Dutch East Indies, on a commission of 3 per cent of purchases, plus an annual salary of $ 10,000. In August 1940 petitioner and Duys entered into a new contract providing for the payment of the sum of 3 per cent commission and $ 10,000 salary, plus a bonus of 25…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steur v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API