Rule v. Gumeer
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Fremont Cownty Court. It appears from the record in this case that October 15, A. D. 1885, appellee, Augustus R. Gumeer, recovered judgment against appellant, Gabrial F. Rule, and one Thomas N. Richards, as copartners, for the sum of $611.95; that execution was" issued the same day, and delivered to the sheriff of that county, and on November 20, 1885, was wholly unsatisfied.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Fremont Cownty Court. It appears from the record in this case that October 15, A. D. 1885, appellee, Augustus R. Gumeer, recovered judgment against appellant, Gabrial F. Rule, and one Thomas N. Richards, as copartners, for the sum of $611.95; that execution was" issued the same day, and delivered to the sheriff of that county, and on November 20, 1885, was wholly unsatisfied. On the day last named notice was given to appellant and his co-defendant that upon November 23d application would be made to the county judge for an order requiring them to appear and make answer concerning…
1Opinion of the Court
Pattison, C.
The proceeding in which the order was made which appellant sought to vacate was instituted under chapter 19 of the old code, relating to proceedings subsequent to execution. The only question presented by the record wfifich need be considered by this court is whether the order appealed from was an appealable order under the act of 1885, relating to appeals to this court, which was then in force. It is not necessary to determine whether or not there was any authority for the preliminary restraining order.
Section 2 of that act defined the orders from which an appeal might be taken.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Green v. BullardNew York Supreme Court · 1853