Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1992No. 45A03-9110-CR-318PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Carlos Rafael Johnson appeals his conviction for rape, a Class B felony, raising two issues for our review:

I. Whether the trial court erred in admitting certain testimony over Johnson's hearsay objection.

II. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.

We affirm.

I

Hearsay

Johnson argues that the trial court erred in permitting the victim's friend to testify as to what the victim had told her about the incident. Johnson argues that he preserved his hearsay objection on the same basis as did the defendant in Modesitt v. State (1991), Ind., 578 N.E.2d 649. While he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Modesitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Traver v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Matheney v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
  3. Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Ewing v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API