Legal Opinion

City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2004No. 95408, 95803 cons. RelPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

Docket Nos 95408, 95803 cons.–Agenda 7–November 2003.

THE CITY OF URBANA, Appellee, v. ANDREW N.B., Appellant.–THE CITY OF CHAMPAIGN, Appellee, v. MONTRELL D.H., Appellant.

Opinion filed June 24, 20004.

2Opinion of the Court · FitzgeraldJustice Fitzgerald

In separate proceedings, Andrew N.B and Montrell D.H., both minors, entered uncounseled guilty pleas to violating municipal ordinances in the Cities of Urbana and Champaign and received dispositions of court supervision. When they violated the terms of their supervision, the Cities filed contempt petitions. The trial court found the minors in contempt and sentenced them to detention; the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API