Legal Opinion

Ditto v. International Harvester Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1921No. 21148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Arthur C. Wake ley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover damages from defendant that he alleged arose out of the fraudulent sale to him by defendant’s agents of a defective stationary engine that was intended to be used for pumping water for irrigation purposes on plaintiff’s farm near Gillette, Wyoming. At the close of the testimony, when both parties had rested, the court directed a verdict against plaintiff and in favor of defendant for $1,305 on its cross-petition for an alleged remainder of the unpaid purchase price. The plaintiff appealed from a judgment on the verdict.

Plaintiff alleged generally that in April, 1913,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  2. Advance Thresher Co. v. VinckelNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Springer v. HenthornNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Buckley v. Advance Rumely Thresher Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Maxwell Implement Co. v. FitzgeraldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API