Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Bank of Ashe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 25, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Oueiam.

There are many exceptions and assignments of error made by defendants that we think unnecessary to consider.

We have read the record and the briefs of the litigants with care. From the record in this Court the judgment is ambiguous and not supported by the record. Defendants agreed to nothing and stood on their legal rights which they had a right to do.

In Yol. 1, 2d ed., Black on Judgments, part section 123 pp. 119-180, speaking to the subject we find: “The rule for the construction of ambiguous judgments is clearly stated by the Supreme Court of Kansas in the following language:…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Abernethy v. First Security Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Northwestern Bank v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API