State Ex Rel. Simmerock v. Brackmann
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
KAROHL, Judge.
We granted a provisional writ in prohibition on respondent judge to determine whether as a matter of law a full release by plaintiff of relator as defendant in a personal injury suit bars a cross-claim of a co-defendant for contribution or indemnity. Relator contends that the provisions of § 537.060 RSMo Cum.Supp.1984 (laws 1983) are binding on the co-defendant and the court. If that is so, relator is entitled to prohibition on respondent from proceeding further in the suit, Fenlon, et ux. v. The Western Casualty & Surety Company, John…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitehead & Kales Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State Ex Rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BuderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State Ex Rel. O'Blennis v. AdolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State Ex Rel. New Liberty Hospital District v. PrattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Police Retirement System v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Fisher v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- State v. ThomastonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Elsie v. Firemaster ApparatusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hogan v. Armstrong World IndustriesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.