Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Simmerock v. Brackmann

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1986No. 51580PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

KAROHL, Judge.

We granted a provisional writ in prohibition on respondent judge to determine whether as a matter of law a full release by plaintiff of relator as defendant in a personal injury suit bars a cross-claim of a co-defendant for contribution or indemnity. Relator contends that the provisions of § 537.060 RSMo Cum.Supp.1984 (laws 1983) are binding on the co-defendant and the court. If that is so, relator is entitled to prohibition on respondent from proceeding further in the suit, Fenlon, et ux. v. The Western Casualty & Surety Company, John…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitehead & Kales Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. State Ex Rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BuderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. O'Blennis v. AdolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. New Liberty Hospital District v. PrattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Police Retirement System v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Fisher v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. State v. ThomastonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Elsie v. Firemaster ApparatusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Hogan v. Armstrong World IndustriesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API