Legal Opinion
Mateo v. Carinha
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 5, 2020No. 19-1078-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
19-1078-cv Mateo v. Carinha UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel. At…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Donald L. Terwilliger, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Donald L. Terwilliger, III and John Terwilliger, Defendants-Appellants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Parks Real Estate Purchasing Group v. St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- James J. Collins, Jr. v. Judith Harrison-Bode, Monet Group, Inc., Monet Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- FIH, LLC v. Foundation Capital Partners, LLC.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Shklovskiy v. KhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.