McKenzie v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
GARY ALLEN FEESS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff LaMecia McKenzie (“McKenzie”), a former hourly employee of Defendant Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”), moves for class certification of a California Labor Code section 226(a)(2), (a)(6) and (a)(9) claim alleging defects in wage and hour statements periodically provided to FedEx employees. McKenzie contends, inter alia, that the requirements of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) class have been met because “questions of law or fact common to class members…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alonzo v. Maximus, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- In re Bank of America Wage & Hour Employment LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Ricaldai v. US Investigations Services, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Balasanyan v. Nordstrom, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Boyd v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.