Morris v. Blazer

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

Plaintiff rcovered a judgment for services as a real-estate agent. Defendant in his appeal suggests no substantial grounds for a reversal. There was a conflict in the evidence upon the question whether Kraft, the person produced by plaintiff, was ready, able, and willing to exchange farms on terms satisfactory to defendant. The court fairly instructed the jury upon all the issues and the jury determined the facts in plaintiff’s favor.

It was conceded that the written contract for the exchange was void for the reason that it was not signed by…