United States v. John M. Herbert and Thomas W. Moore
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
John Herbert and Thomas Moore were convicted of knowingly possessing marijuana with an intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Upon trial no witnesses were called by either defendant, and hence testimony concerning the events which gave rise to the present prosecution necessarily comes from the Government’s witnesses. At the outset we would observe that evidence .of guilt was overwhelming and that the matters here sought to be raised as grounds for reversal tend to be minuscule, when viewed in context. The background facts will only be briefly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Troutman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Fairchild v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Antonio Sanchez MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Oliver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Frank Viserto, Jr., Richard Rocco, Joseph Solce, Garnet Johnson, Sarah Payne, Howard Williams and Prentiss CovingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Michael Joseph OrzechowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Richard J. MaestasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- People v. MarquezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.