Legal Opinion
Stinson v. Ironworkers District Council of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Benefit Trust
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 21, 1989No. 88-1287PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Harold L. Stinson (“Stinson”) and the Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers Local Union No. 22, AFL-CIO (“Local 22”) (plaintiffs-appellants are collectively referred to as “Local 22”) brought suit against defendant Iron Workers District Council of Southern Ohio and Vicinity Benefit Trust (“Ohio Trust” or “Trust”). Count I of the two-count complaint sought injunctive relief against Ohio Trust’s denial of benefits to members of Local 22 following their withdrawal from the Trust. Count II alleged that an amendment to the Trust Agreement violated § 302(c)(5) of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Funds v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Albert Van Boxel, Cross-Appellee v. The Journal Company Employees' Pension Trust, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- James J. Reiherzer v. Daniel J. Shannon, and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harold L. Stinson v. Ironworkers District Council Of Southern Ohio And Vicinity Benefit TrustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989