Fox v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant moves for rehearing and asserts that the case should be reversed and the prosecution dismissed in that the law under which he was convicted has been repealed. He is mistaken. The law has been amended but not repealed. The penalty for the amended statute is the same as it was prior to such amendment. Examination reveals that articles 1103 and 1105, 1925, P. C., were amended by the terms of Chap. 46, Acts Regular Session, 43rd Legislature, so as that the definition of the offense for which appellant was convicted has been changed, — but,…