Legal Opinion

In re City of Pittsburgh

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided January 10, 1940No. 1693Published

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.,

This is a rule to show cause why certain tax liens should not be stricken off. The facts are not in dispute. Petitioner, the City of Pittsburgh, on July 7, 1924, by sheriff’s sale, upon a delinquent tax lien bought in the property here involved and, by sheriff’s deed, holds the record title thereto. The County of Allegheny has continued to assess, levy, and lien its tax claims against the said lots in the name of the City of Pittsburgh. No income is derived from the property. No actual use is made of *464it. Upon the rule presented, the question we are called upon to decide is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth State Emp. Ret. System v. Dau. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Philadelphia v. BarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Baker v. KirschnekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. County of Erie v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Evans v. PhillipiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API