Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Ladin & D. & C. Textile Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.

We believe that Special Term acted correctly in refusing to stay arbitration, though not all of us arrive at that conclusion by identical reasoning. As stated more fully in the dissenting opinion, the respondents here initiated an arbitration proceeding against respondents in the arbitration for breach of a contract and thereafter started a suit at law against other persons for inducing the breach which is the subject of the arbitration.

One Judge is of the opinion that the commencement of the action is, at most, a defense, in the same category as limitations, release, or the like, cognizable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Tracy v. Reynolds & TuckerNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colbert v. International Security Bureau, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Murray Hill Investments, Inc. v. Adas Yereim, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Preiss/Breismeister Architects v. Westin Hotel Company-Plaza Hotel DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. United States v. Al SharafDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API