Legal Opinion

Pagames v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 14, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Bill to enjoin municipality from interference with fruit and flower stands. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

Appellants, ten in number, who were fruit and flower dealers at different places in what is known as the South Side down town business district in the city of Chicago, filed their bill September 17, 1902, against the city of Chicago, F. W. Blocki, Commissioner of Public Works, 1VL J. Dougherty, Superintendent of Streets, and Peter Kiolbassa, Commissioner of Buildings, to enjoin the defendants from x removing, molesting or interfering with complainants, or either of them, in the exercise and prosecution of their said business at their respective business places specified in the bill. On the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Faulkner v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Edwards v. HaegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. John Anisfield Co. v. Edward B. Grossman & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. Heineck v. GrosseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  5. Kesner v. MieschAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. PooleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  2. Salzer v. Bowlus-Hackett Fruit Co.Clark County Court of Common Pleas · 1914
  3. Wicks v. ComvesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API