Legal Opinion

Dopson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1968No. 5-4535PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant Ross Dopson instituted this action in chancery court for specific performance of a rider giving coverage to his wife, Aurelle Dopson, under a group hospitalization policy issued hy appellee Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. From a decree denying relief to appellant and awarding relief upon a cross-complaint to appellee, appellant relies upon the following points for reversal:

I. THE FINDING OF THE COURT THAT APPELLANT HAD FAILED TO DISCLOSE THE HISTORY OF HIS WIFE’S PRIOR BACK TROUBLE IN THE APPLICATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE COMPETENT…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. National Old Line Insurance Company v. PeopleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Marshall v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. American Pioneer Life Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Ford Life Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API