Legal Opinion

Burk v. Howard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Decatur Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavisobt, J.

This was an action by Burk against Howard and Armstrong, upon a replevin bond. The complaint alleges these facts: On Hovember 12, 1858, Howard commenced an action of replevin, in said Court, against Burlt^ to recover sixteen fat hogs, alleged to be the property of Howard, and to be unlawfully detained by Burk. The sheriff, by virtue of a writ of replevin issued in said action, seized the hogs, and having delivered them to Howard, took from him a bond in the penalty of $600, with Armstrong as his security, conditioned, that “If Howard shall well and -truly prosecute his suit to effect, and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. DronebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Ham v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. June v. PayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Mitchell v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Talcott v. Pine GroveU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API