Legal Opinion

In re Cobb

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Bankruptcy. The referee certifies the following findings of fact and conclusions of law for review: “That on the 12th day of October. 1898, J. Haywood Sawyer having on deposit with the bank of Guirkin & Co. the sum of $1,302.70, the firm of Guirkin & Go., then doing a general banking business, and desiring to obtain a loan of $3,000 or more, made application to said Sawyer for a loan of such amount; that G. W. Oobb, a member of the firm of Guirkin & Go., was informed by…

Read the full summary

In Bankruptcy. The referee certifies the following findings of fact and conclusions of law for review: “That on the 12th day of October. 1898, J. Haywood Sawyer having on deposit with the bank of Guirkin & Co. the sum of $1,302.70, the firm of Guirkin & Go., then doing a general banking business, and desiring to obtain a loan of $3,000 or more, made application to said Sawyer for a loan of such amount; that G. W. Oobb, a member of the firm of Guirkin & Go., was informed by said Sawyer that he had on hand in the applicant’s bank the sum of $1,302.70, and that he would and could obtain for him…

1Opinion of the Court

PURKELL, District Judge.

The referee fails to find as a fact, which is shown by the testimony, that on the day of the transaction *823under consideration there was less than $500 of currency on hand, or to consider the further fact, heretofore found by the court and evident from the record, that: George W. Cobb was the only member of the Ann of Guirkin & Go.; and in making the assignment the act of bankruptcy for which both George W. Cobb individually, and as surviving' partner .of Guirkin & Co., was liable, the adjudication was made as to both, or Cobb acting in the dual capacity. Bray v. Cobb,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. James L. v. CarrylSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Clark v. IselinSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Shields v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re SanderlinDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1901
  2. In re EaglesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1900
  3. In re PorterfieldDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1905
  4. In re Waterloo Organ Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1902
  5. Wilson v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API