Legal Opinion

In Re Miller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 2006No. 96,578PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam-.

This is an original uncontested proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against respondent, Christopher Roger Paul Miller, of Lawrence, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas in 1984.

A panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys held the hearing on the formal complaint on Januaiy 17, 2006. A few days prior to the hearing, respondent filed an amended answer to the complaint wherein he admitted most of the allegations in the complaint and that he had violated KRPC 1.5(a) (2005 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 397) (unreasonable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re LandrithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. In the Matter of DevkotaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. In Re JohanningSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. In Re MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. In re HarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API