Tri-State Transit Co. of Louisiana, Inc. v. Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
The appellant, the Tri-State Transit Company, has a certificate of public necessity and convenience (a franchise) from the Interstate Commerce Commission to do an interstate business between Jackson and the Tennessee line,- which is only a few miles south of Memphis in that state, and from the Public Service Commission of this state to do a local business between those points. It makes six round trips per day between Memphis and Jackson, four of which operate as through busses and two local.
The appellee, the Dixie Greyhound Lines, has a franchise from the Interstate Commerce Commission to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago Railways Co. v. Commerce Commission Ex Rel. Chicago Motor Coach Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
- Tri-State Transit Co. of Louisiana, Inc. v. Mobile & Ohio Transp. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1941
- Gulf Mobile & O. R. R. v. Luter Motor ExpressMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by29 opinions
- Capital Electric Power Ass'n v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- MISS. PUBLIC SERV. COM'N v. Miss. Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Citizens of Stringer v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
- MISS. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N v. Miss. Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1976
- Cobb Bros. Const. v. Gulp, M. & O. R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.