Legal Opinion
Harvinder-Singh Gill v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 5, 2026No. 1:26-cv-00521Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HARVINDER-SINGH GILL, Case No. 1:26-cv-00521-JLT-EPG-HC 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PETITION FOR WRIT OF 13 v. HABEAS CORPUS AND DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO PROVIDE 14 CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., PETITIONER WITH A BOND HEARING BEFORE AN IMMIGRATION JUDGE 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, represented by counsel, is an immigration detainee proceeding with a petition 18 for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons stated herein, the 19 undersigned recommends granting…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.