Bromley v. City of Indianapolis

CONCURRING OPINION

Royse, P. J.—

(Concurring in Conclusion)

I agree with the conclusion of the majority in this case. In their opinion it is stated:

“In support of his appeal the appellant has tendered a brief which, it seems to us, makes little effort to comply with the rules. The condensed recital of the evidence omits all evidence favorable to the appellees and the propositions and points are stated without any apparent relation to the assignment of errors and the motion for a new trial. There is no separate title ‘Argument’ but argument is interspersed and co-mingled with the statement of the…