The Florida Bar v. Scott
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
566 So.2d 765 (1990)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Gordon B. SCOTT, Respondent.
No. 73211.
Supreme Court of Florida.
September 6, 1990.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Greenberg, Asst. Staff Counsel, and David R. Ristoff, Branch Staff Counsel, Tampa, for complainant.
John A. Weiss, Tallahassee, for respondent.
2Per curiam
This cause is before us upon the complaint of The Florida Bar and the report of the referee.[1] Respondent seeks review of the findings of fact and recommendations as to discipline set forth in the referee's report. We…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Florida Bar v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- The Florida Bar v. ColcloughSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Florida Bar v. LehrmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
4Cited by9 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. RoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- The Florida Bar v. McHenrySupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- The Florida Bar v. SimringSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- The Florida Bar v. CramerSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- The Florida Bar v. WeissSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.