Legal Opinion

Alkon v. Senior & Palmer, Inc.

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided December 10, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

A formal petition having been filed in the above matter to which an answer was thereafter filed denying the allegations contained therein and setting up the defense that the petitioner was a casual employe.

On December 4th, 1935, testimony was adduced before me and after listening to the said testimony and stipulation of facts I do find and determine as follows:

The petitioner alleges that on January 24th he was employed by the respondent and that he was to shovel snow at the Millstone Junction of the Pennsylvania Eailroad. He further testified that no one told him he was being hired to shovel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. WagnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winters v. PayneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API