Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 4, 2007No. 06-2249PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAREN K. CALDWELL, District Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Freddie Brown, III appeals the district court’s judgment sentencing him to 24 months of imprisonment for violating conditions of his supervised release. Brown argues that the district court did not adequately consider the relevant Sentencing Guidelines policy statements or the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Specifically, Brown argues the district court only considered Brown’s need for drug and alcohol treatment and failed to consider all other relevant factors. For the following reasons, we affirm Brown’s sentence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Samuel F. CollingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Mary A. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. BoldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API