Legal Opinion

Burrows 611438 v. Macauley

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided December 30, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00801Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ CAMERON DANIEL BURROWS, Petitioner, Case No. 1:19-cv-801 v. Honorable Janet T. Neff MATT MACAULEY, Respondent. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Promptly after the filing of a petition for habeas corpus, the Court must undertake a preliminary review of the petition to determine whether “it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API