Legal Opinion

Israel v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony M. Livoti, J.

In an action to recover for personal injuries and loss of services, sustained as the result of a fall on an allegedly defective sidewalk, plaintiffs move to strike the affirmative defense: ‘£ That the plaintiffs have failed to comply with the provisions of Section 394a-1.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, in that they failed to commence their action within the statutory period of limitation.”

The accident occurred on June 29, 1959. On September 23, 1959 plaintiffs served a notice of claim on the defendant City of New York, pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Amex Asphalt Corporation v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Woodcrest Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Javet v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Berman v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Gurfein v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Santaniello v. De FranciscoNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Franklin Society Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Barchet v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Greco v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. Rowe v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API