Szemansco v. Szemansco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCarpinello, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Seibert, Jr., J.), entered June 20, 2003 in Saratoga County, which denied plaintiffs motion to modify the maintenance provisions of the parties’ judgment of divorce.
Pursuant to the parties’ 1999 judgment of divorce, plaintiff is obligated to pay defendant $400 per week in spousal maintenance until he turns 65 or retires, whichever event occurs later in time (285 AD2d 851 [2001]). In 2003, plaintiff sought to eliminate this obligation on the ground that, among other things, defendant was holding herself out as another man’s wife pursuant to Domestic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bliss v. BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Northrup v. NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Markhoff v. MarkhoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hofmeister v. HofmeisterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Szemansco v. SzemanscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Florio v. FlorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Okvist v. ControAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Graev v. GraevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Harrington v. HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Blish v. MazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.