Jackson ex dem. Trustees of Kingston v. Louw
New York Supreme Court
THIS was an action of ejectment for lands in the town of Saugerties, in the county of Ulster',, and1 was tried before Mr,: Justice Van Ness, at the Ulster circuit, in .September, 1814. The premises in question were within the bounds of the pa-Kingston.
Read the full summary
THIS was an action of ejectment for lands in the town of Saugerties, in the county of Ulster',, and1 was tried before Mr,: Justice Van Ness, at the Ulster circuit, in .September, 1814. The premises in question were within the bounds of the pa-Kingston. The plaintiff -produced á1 deed;, dated the 28^1 °f November, 1812, from the defendant and - others to-Van Aken, one of the, lessors of the- plaintiff, of a lot of land,' “ beginning, at. a stone set up in the ground, standing on the south side of the Piattekill.,. and thence runs so.uth, &c. west,1 Sec. to a white, oák tree /narked, See. then…
1Opinion of the CourtYates, J.
It is admitted that the lands in question are included in the patent of Kingston; and the deed from the trustees of Kingston to the lessor of the plaintiff, evidently comprehended the premises in question. Unless, therefore, the premises passed to the defendant by the deed from the same trustees of the 30th of June, *2541804, the plaintiff must recover,, at ail events,, to the extent of what is not embraced by ¡that deed; provided the trustees, on the 12th ot April, 1813, had a right to cohvey to the lessor'of the plaintiff, or still retained title to the premises sufficient to enable them to…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Ex parte JenningsNew York Supreme Court · 1826
- Wetmore v. LawNew York Supreme Court · 1860
- Pike v. MunroeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
- Fletcher v. Thunder Bay River Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Kentucky Lumber Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.