Legal Opinion

In re Andrews

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 10, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.

The testator’s last will and testament consists of three instruments, that hereinafter referred to as the will, and a first and second codicil. He left him surviving his wife, three daughters and a son. Among the provisions of the will in favor of the daughters, there is a bequest to one of $3,000, and for each of the other two, he established trusts in the same amount.

In the second codicil the testator provided as follows: “ Having increased my holdings in stocks, I hereby give and bequeath to my said daughters, Florence M., Luella B., and Adele M., a trust fund of three thousand…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BuechnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. In Re the Accounting of EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Stokes v. . WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. In Re the Probate of Will of HitchcockNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings HardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of InnerfieldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  2. In re the Estate of BayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
  3. In re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re the Estate of DowningNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API