Duo Metal & Iron Works, Inc. v. General Iron Works Corp. (In Re Duo Metal & Iron Works, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge:
One of several issues presented for discussion in the matter at bench is whether we should pierce the corporate veil of an entity other than the debtor and subject that entity’s president to one of its corporate liabilities. For the reasons expressed herein we conclude that the corporate veil should not be pierced.
The facts of this case are as follows: 1 The debtor is a designer and fabricator of metal work that filed a petition for reorganization under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) on October 13, 1984. The debtor’s physical plant is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Klemow v. Time IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- In re McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- DuSesoi v. United Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Blose v. MartensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Green v. Geyen (In Re Geyen)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lesser v. A-Z Associates (In Re Lion Capital Group)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Montgomery v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Ellwood City Iron & Wire Co. v. Flakt, Inc. (In Re Ellwood City Iron & Wire Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- MB Ltd. Partnership v. Nutri/System, Inc. (In Re Nutri/System, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Brenner v. Sackett (In re Sackett)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.