Stucco, Inc. v. Rose
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Bruce T. Bullion, Special Judge.
The claimant in this workers’ compensation case, Donald Rose, sustained a work-related injury on June 26, 1990, that resulted in an anatomical impairment of thirteen percent to the body as a whole. As a result of the combined effects of this compensable injury and a preexisting disability or impairment, the claimant was rendered permanently totally disabled. The appellant accepted the claim as compensable, as did the Second Injury Fund, but a dispute arose concerning the rate at which the claimant’s thirteen percent should be paid, i.e., whether the permanent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Second Injury Fund v. Riceland Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- New Hampshire Insurance v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Buckner v. Sparks Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lee v. Alcoa Extrusion, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Stucco Plus, Inc. v. RoseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Southeast Arkansas Human Development Center v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007