Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided April 1, 2009No. 09-07-00256-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.

A jury found Nathaniel Dywane Clark guilty of murder and assessed punishment at fifty years of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 19.02(b)(1) (Vernon 2003). Clark presents three issues for review. He argues the trial court erred by questioning two witnesses during trial in the presence of the jury. He maintains the trial court erred by allowing into evidence statements which he asserts are hearsay. Clark also argues that, in violation of his right to due process, the trial court deprived Clark…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Unkart, Rodney GaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Render v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2011
  3. Donjel Lamont Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
  4. Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  5. Gary Lee Avant v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API