Legal Opinion

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RIVERSIDE CTY. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1994No. E013090Published

1Opinion of the Court

23 Cal.App.4th 830 (1994)

28 Cal. Rptr.2d 560

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY et al., Petitioners,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Respondent; TEMECULA RANCHOS, Real Party in Interest.

Docket No. E013090.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

March 22, 1994.

COUNSEL

William C. Katzenstein, County Counsel, Lorenz, Alhadeff, Cannon & Rose and Steven W. Winton for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Best, Best & Krieger, Michelle Ouellette and Meredith Jury for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

TIMLIN, Acting P.J.

The underlying action to which this writ…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API