Legal Opinion

Hill v. DaCosta

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 15, 1913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

The appellant filed a hill of complaint, against the appellees in which it is alleged that the appellant “is the owner of the fee simple title in and to” lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of Hills Addition to Gainesville, in Alachua County, Florida; that appellant “has been in the actual possession of the same; that he had a substantial enclosure around this property, with other property, this land being included within the enclosure, from about the year 1886 to the year 1890; that sometime during the year 1890 the fence around this property was burned and your orator did not rebuild it, but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levy v. LaddSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  2. Jarrell v. McRaineySupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  3. Houston v. McKinneySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  4. Harris v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. McElvySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Brickell v. TrammelSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  3. Norton v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Brecht v. Bur-Ne Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. Morgan v. DunwoodySupreme Court of Florida · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API