Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Simpson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1989No. 16-83-02801; CA A45782PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Appellant, a surety, appeals a September, 1987, judgment against it on an undertaking on appeal. ORS 19.040. In May, 1984, plaintiff obtained a judgment for fraud against defendant Simpson for $125,563, and he appealed. In connection with that appeal, he posted the undertaking on which he was the principal and appellant was the surety. The undertaking bore the title “supersede[as] undertaking” and declared:

“WHEREAS, the above named defendant desires to give an undertaking as provided to be given in ORS 19.040 of the State of Oregon.
“NOW, THEREFORE, we, Defendant, as principal and OREGON…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simpson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Hecht v. James and Farmers Mut. Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Computer Concepts, Inc., Profit Sharing Plan v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API