Legal Opinion

United States v. Francklyn

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 21, 1913No. 902PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7346 (T. D. 32378).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The importation covered by the protest in this case consists of Keene’s cement in barrels. It was assessed under paragraph 88 of *55the tariff act of 1909 at $10 per ton, the applicable provisions of which are as follows:

* * * Cement of which gypsum is the component material of chief value, if valued at ten dollars per ton or less, three dollars and fifty cents per ton; if valued above ten dollars and not above fifteen dollars per ton, five dollars per ton; if valued above fifteen dollars and not above thirty dollars per ton, ten dollars per ton; * * *.

The claim of the importer as stated in his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saxonville Mills v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Rice v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1892

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Scaramelli & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Bel Paese Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. United States v. Spingarn Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. United States v. DornCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. United States v. SuzarteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API