Legal Opinion

Tiano v. Yaple

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1968Published

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.

In this action in which the complaint sets forth a cause of action for the recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff and a derivative cause of action for damages sustained by her father, plaintiffs move to set aside the judgment for costs entered by defendant against plaintiffs.

Under CPLR 1205, costs may not be taxed against either the infant or his representative unless a court so orders; but, if the representative joins a claim in his individual capacity with the claim of the infant whom he represents, said section has no application to the resulting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Giebner v. RetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Letson v. De LongNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API