Legal Opinion

Department of the Army v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1990No. Nos. 88-7004, 88-7158PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

The Department of the Army (“the Army”) timely petitions for review of a Federal Labor Relations Authority (“FLRA” or “the Authority”) decision ordering the Army to bargain with Service Employees International Union, Local 556 (“the Union”) over two proposals relating to holidays and temporary disability insurance benefits for certain Nonappropriated Fund (“NAF”) employees. The FLRA cross-petitions for enforcement of its decision. We have subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7123 and grant the FLRA’s petition to enforce its bargaining order.

*1292I

Al…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Fort Stewart Schools v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Doris M. Calder v. Max D. Crall and Sgt. Terry L. EarlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Department Of The Army v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API