Eliason v. Englehart
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Per curiam
In this appeal, we construe the statute governing irrevocable proxies. Specifically, we consider whether a proxy “states that it is irrevocable,” as required by statute, where the only mention of the proxy being irrevocable is found in a notarized acknowledgment at the bottom of the document. Because the sole purpose of an acknowledgment is to validate the signature on the document, we hold that it cannot be used to satisfy substantive requirements of the proxy statute. Accordingly, we reverse.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Brosius-Eliason Co. is a building and materials company whose…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Seabrooke v. GarciaOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Streett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Duffy v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- PHL Variable Insurance v. Price Dawe 2006 Insurance Trust Ex Rel. Christiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- CML V, LLC v. BaxSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Doroshow, Pasquale, Krawitz & Bhaya v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2012
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.