Hughes v. Hood
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from, Johnson Court of Common Pleas. cited in argument Mack i. Patchen, 42 N. Y. 167; Sedgw. Dam. 194 and notes, 201; Trull .v..Granger et al., 4 Seld. 115; Kelly y. The Dutch Church of Schenectady, 2 Hill, 116 ; Fisher v. Goebel, 40 Mo. 475 ; Schlem.mer v. North, 32 Mo. 206 ; Kinney y. Watts, 14 Wend. 38. cited Sedgvr. Dam. 86,; Driggs y. Dwight, 17 Wend. 71; Lawrence v. Wardwell, 6 Barb. 423 ; Ward v. Smith, 11 Price, 19 ; Johnson y. Arnold, 2 Cush. 46.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge
On the 12th day of February, 1869, the defendants leased to the plaintiffs a farm owned by them in Johnson county for one year, the lease to commence the 1st of March, 1869, at which *351time, by tbe terms of the lease, possession of the farm was to be given to the plaintiffs. When the time arrived to take possession the plaintiffs found a former tenant of the landlord holding over, who refused to surrender the possession, and it was agreed betweeu the plaintiffs and defendants that the plaintiffs should bring a suit for the possession against the tenant holding over, the defendants to pay the…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Sloan v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Hodges v. A. P. Fries & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Herpolsheimer v. ChristopherNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Snider v. DebanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- King v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.