Legal Opinion

DiCamillo v. City of Philadelphia & Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1974No. Appeal, No. 118 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

This is an appeal by Janice DiCamillo, a workmen’s compensation claimant, from an order of the Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia affirming an order of the Workmen’s Compensation (Appeal) Board reversing a referee’s award of benefits.

Since the Board’s decision was rendered prior to the May 1,1972 effective date of the amendments to Section 423 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act by the Act of February 8, 1972, P. L. , No. 12, and the Act of March 29, 1972, P. L. , No. 61, 77 P.S. §854 (Supp. 1974-1975), the Board could, as it did here, disregard the referee’s findings of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. A. Steiert & Sons, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Drevitch v. Beverly Farms, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Stringe v. S & S Maintenance Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kerchner v. Materials Transport Service, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Kania v. Ebensburg State School & HospitalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Boughter v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. George v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Ulmer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API