Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1972No. 71-756Published

1DissentBrown, J.

The appellant’s operations on the subject property consist of providing railway service to the grain company via a track which connects the grain company facilities with the main railway network. Bail-road personnel are employed in order to facilitate the operation of this spur and the railroad hopper cars operating thereon.

*86After a public bearing and consideration of tbe evidence, tbe attorney-examiner made these specific findings of fact, which are not in dispnte before this conrt:

“1. Tbe evidence produced at tbe bearing supports the allegation and complaint that tbe respondent has permitted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Akron & Barberton Belt Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API