Legal Opinion
In re Totarello
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 14, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAKE, District Judge.
Question arises in each of these cases as to whether the bankrupts were required to file- applications for discharge under the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, 11 U.S.C.A. § 32, sub. a, before discharges can be granted. It is argued that Chapter III, Sec. 14, sub. a, of the Chandler Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 32, sub. a, made the filing of such applications unnecessary.
In neither of these cases were applications for discharge filed within the twelve month period required by Sec. 32, sub. a, supra. In the Dougan case, the time expired on the 10th day of June, 1938, and in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dickinson Industrial Site, Inc. v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In Re Old Algiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- In re EwingDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. And Chauncey H. Levy v. A. Jesse Goldstein & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- In re PowersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
- In re TurnerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1940