Legal Opinion
Hinkley v. Berryhill
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 23, 2023No. 3:18-cv-02512Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MARK HINKLEY, Case No.: 18CV2512 JAH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 11 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING 12 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION Commissioner of Social Security,1 13 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 20, 21] 14 15 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Mark Hinkley seeks review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final 19 decision denying benefits. After a thorough review of the parties’ submissions and for the 20 reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.