Legal Opinion

People v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal held and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for consideration of defendant’s appellate counsel’s request for permission to examine the presentence report, in accordance with the following memorandum: The District Attorney concedes that in light of People v Rogers (54 AD2d 616) defendant’s appellate counsel is entitled to examine the presentence report. The concession implies that the facts in this case are the same as in Rogers where, in the discretion of the sentencing court, all of the presentence report had been released for defendant’s counsel to examine at sentencing.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc. v. ArmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API