Legal Opinion

State v. Powers

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 19, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court. — Hon. Henry L. Edmunds, Judge. (1) The indictment is in all respects sufficient as to the burglary of which appellant was convicted. The instructions fully covered the law of the case, and are in all respects correct. There is no error apparent in the record. (2) ''The testimony of Mrs. Brooks was admissible and competent, its value to be determined by the jury.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court. — Hon. Henry L. Edmunds, Judge. (1) The indictment is in all respects sufficient as to the burglary of which appellant was convicted. The instructions fully covered the law of the case, and are in all respects correct. There is no error apparent in the record. (2) ''The testimony of Mrs. Brooks was admissible and competent, its value to be determined by the jury. State v. Babb, 76 Mo. 501; State v. Lick-son, 78 Mo. 438; State v. Eopkirk, 84 Mo. 278. (3) The question asked of witness Rehn: “how, don’t you know that several other persons were arrested that…

1Opinion of the CourtG-antt, P. J.

Defendant was jointly'indicted with one O’Hearn, in the St. Louis criminal court, for burglary in the second degree. A severance was granted and defendant on a separate trial was convicted.

The indictment was entirely sufficient. There is no error in the record proper. The evidence tended very strongly to identify defendant and O’Hearn as the perpetrators of a burglary into the dwelling house of T. A. Morgan, number 1075 Selby Place, in the city of St. Louis.

The testimony on the part of the state tended to show as follows: Mr. and Mrs. T. A. Morgan resided in a dwelling house, number 1075…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HopkirkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. Blackmore and GodseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Craig v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Roszczyniala v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. CarollaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API