Legal Opinion

Morrel & West, Inc. v. Yazel

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 20, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This appeal arises from the Fayette Circuit Court’s dismissal of appellant/Morrel & West, Inc.’s, suit upon a foreign judgment against appellee/William Yazel. The judgment, entered by default, was obtained in Oklahoma. It represents attorney fees owed by Yazel to Morrel & West, a law firm of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Morrel & West performed services involving the filing of state (Oklahoma) and federal tax returns for Yazel, a former resident of Oklahoma now residing in Fayette County, Kentucky. The legal representation was solicited by Yazel, by phone, and the transactions were handled…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Anderson v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Hanshew v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sunrise Turquoise, Inc. v. Chemical Design Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API